WP No. 30391 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 30391 of 2025 C.Murugan ..Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur, Tamil Nadu. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvallur District. 3. The Tahsildar, Office Of The Tahsildar, Thiruvallur District. 4. The Assistant Director, Land Survey Records Department, Thiruvallur District. ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 27.05.2025 and restore the extent of land in survey No 119/7, to 6.50 cents at Kuppam Village, Thiruthani Taluk, as per the original FMB, before carrying out any further survey or revenue update. For Petitioner: Mr.P.R.Thiruneelakandan For Respondents: Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Government’s Counsel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30391 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 5 ORDER This writ petition is filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 27.05.2025. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the absolute owner of the house site comprised in Survey No.119/7, measuring 6.50 cents, situated at Kuppam Village, Thiruthani Taluk, Thiruvallur District, by virtue of a registered Sale Deed bearing Document No.1102 of 1993, and was also issued Patta No.1388. He further submits that in the original Field Measurement Book (FMB), the land was accurately recorded as 6.50 cents; however, it was subsequently, unilaterally, and arbitrarily altered to 6.17 cents. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 27.05.2025 to the revenue authorities requesting the restoration of the original extent of land as per the pre-UDR records. Since the said representation has not been considered to date, the petitioner has been constrained to file the present writ petition. 3. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government’s Counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner’s representation dated 27.05.2025 will be considered within a period of six weeks. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30391 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 5 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the third respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 27.05.2025, after issuing due notice and affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner as well as the aggrieved parties, if any, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 22-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30391 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 5 To 1. The District Collector, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur, Tamil Nadu. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvallur District. 3. The Tahsildar, Office Of The Tahsildar, Thiruvallur District. 4. The Assistant Director, Land Survey Records Department, Thiruvallur District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30391 of 2025 __________ Page5 of 5 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 30391 of 2025 22-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis