Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9088 (AP)

Sidda Raghava Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/5940/2020 · 2025-09-10

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010099202020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT Between: 1. Sidda Raghava Rao,, Son of Venkteswarulu, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Business and National Treasurer of Telugu Desam Party, Resident of D.No. 8 24, Denuvakonda Vari Street, 5th lane, Mangamuru Road, Ongole, Prakasam District 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by the Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagaudi, Amaravti, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Inspector General of Police Intelligence, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, Ongole. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue a Writ, in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order declaring the Notice C.No. 560/SB IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5940 OF 2020 1. Sidda Raghava Rao,, Son of Venkteswarulu, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Business and National Treasurer of Telugu Desam Party, Resident of D.No. 8 24, Denuvakonda Vari Street, 5th lane, Mangamuru Road, Ongole, Prakasam ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by the Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagaudi, Amaravti, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh, Mangalagiri, Guntur e Inspector General of Police Intelligence, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, Ongole. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be to issue a Writ, in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order declaring the Notice C.No. 560/SB IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. Sidda Raghava Rao,, Son of Venkteswarulu, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Business and National Treasurer of Telugu Desam Party, Resident of D.No. 8- 24, Denuvakonda Vari Street, 5th lane, Mangamuru Road, Ongole, Prakasam ...Petitioner 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by the Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagaudi, Amaravti, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh, Mangalagiri, Guntur e Inspector General of Police Intelligence, Government of Andhra ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be to issue a Writ, in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order declaring the Notice C.No. 560/SB- Xl/S4/2019, dated 13/02/2020 issued by the Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, the 4th respondent herein, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to provide security i.e. 1 puls 1 security officers to the petitioner. and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue/provide the personal security of 1+1 security officers provided to the petitioner, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: P KAMLAKAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5940 OF 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ, in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order declaring the Notice C.No. 560/SB- Xl/S4/2019, dated 13/02/2020 issued by the Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, the 4th respondent herein, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to provide security i.e. 1 puls 1 security officers to the petitioner. and pass...…” 2. Heard Sri P.Kamalakar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 11.09.2025 KKV 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.5940 of 2020 Dated.11.09.2025 KKV