Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2260 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-329 Year-2024 Thana- BAIRIYA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Shyam Kumar Son of Nathu Sah Resident of Balua Rampurwa, PS- Bairiya, District- West champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. X Wife of Deepak Sah Resident of Balua Rampurwa, PS- Bairiya, District- West champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 03-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 79, 74, 115(2), 329(4), 303, 352, 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023. 3. The informant alleged that on 28.05.2024 at about 11:00 AM, while the informant's daughter was grazing goats, the petitioner allegedly caught her hand, made obscene remarks and attempted to drag her towards the field with bad intentions. It is further alleged that at about 11:30 AM on the same date, when the informant went to the house of petitioner, all the accused persons abused and assaulted and also threatened her with dire
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2260 of 2025(3) dt.03-04-2025 2/3 consequences. Thereafter, the accused persons also entered in the house of informant, assaulted her daughter and looted valuables from the house. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. As a matter of fact, the informant’s daughter allowed her goats to enter in the field of petitioner for grazing, which was objected by the petitioner, and taking advantage of situation, the informant has lodged the present case only to extract money from the petitioner. The victim girl, in her statement recorded under Section 183 B.N.S., has not alleged any wrong against this petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.
10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge 7th cum Special Judge POCSO, Bettiah, West Champaran in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2260 of 2025(3) dt.03-04-2025 3/3 connection with Bairiya P.S. Case No.329 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.,
2023. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T