APHC010100272020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 680/2020 Between: 1. GUDLA RAMANA REDDY, S/O LATE G. APPALA SWAMY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O D.NO.53-6-26, GUDLA NARASIMHA MURTHY VEEDHI, MADDILAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 13. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GUDLA TRINADHA REDDY, S/O GUDLA RAMANA REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O D.NO.53-6-36/1, MADDIAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. GUDLA SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O GUDLA RAMANA REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O D.NO.53-6-36/1, MADDIAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM, 3. GUDLA PYDI REDDY, S/O GUDLA RAMANA REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O D.NO.53-6- 36/1, MADDIAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. SEERAPU LAKSHMI, W/O NOOKA RAJU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, D.NO. 50-48-16/3, GANDHI NAGAR, NAKKAVANIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to allow the Civil Revision Petition by setting aside the order dated 10.12.2019 made in I.A.No. 144 of 2019 in A.S.No.196 of 2018 on the file of the Court of the VI Additional District Judge-cum-Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Visakhapatnam and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to order stay of all further proceedings in A.S.No.196 of 2018 on the file of the VI Additional District Judge-cum-Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Visakhapatnam in the interest of justice pending disposal of the C.R.P. and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K A NARASIMHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Dr.MOJJADA RAMAKRISHNA The Court made the following: ORDER: The present revision is filed against the order dated 10.12.2019 in I.A.No.144 OF 2018 in A.S.No.196 of 2018 on the file of the learned VI Additional District Judge – cum – Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Visakhapatnam. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that, the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 3. The submission is placed on record. 4. In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision and accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR 11th July, 2025 cbn 121 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.680 of 2020 11th July, 2025 cbn