Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9083 (JK)

SURJEET KOUR v. TALAT AHMAD AND ANR. (UNIVERSITY OF KASHMIR) (PERSONAL APPEARANCE 03-05-2024)

CCP(S)/571/2021 · 2025-02-10

Sanjay Dhar

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 28 Regular Cause List. HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 571/2021 in[SWP 743/2014]. SURJEET KOUR. …Petitioner (s) Through: Mr. Abdul Muizz Ahmad, Advocate. VERSUS TALAT AHMAD AND ANR. Through: Mr. Bhat Shafi, Advocate vice Mr. Syed Faisal Qadiri, Sr Advocate. …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE. ORDER 10-02-2025 Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that he has filed the Compliance Report and the judgement of the Writ Court has been complied with. The Compliance Report is, however, not on the record of the file. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the claim of the petitioner has been considered and the same has been rejected by the respondents in terms of Order (Lady-Spt-Asstt)GA/KU/24 dated 3rd May, 2024. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has already received copy of the aforesaid Consideration Order. In view of the above, the judgement of the Writ Court stands complied with. Thus no case for proceeding against the respondents is made out. The contempt proceedings are accordingly closed and the contempt petition shall stand disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid consideration order passed by the respondents by way of appropriate proceedings. (Sanjay Dhar) Judge SRINAGAR 10-02-2025 Showkat Khan