Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010052112024 2025:GAU-AS:10202 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1488/2024 BHOGESWAR SAIKIA S/O- TUNIRAM SAIKIA, R/O- ZOO ROAD TINIALI, NEAR USHA COURT, BHASKAR NAGAR, HOUSE NO.20, P.O. SILPUKHURI, P.S. CHANDMARI, GUWAHATI-03, THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM FOREST AND ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND HEAD OF FOREST FORCE /ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST (PLANNING) ANANYA BHAWAN PANJABARI GUWAHATI-37 ASSAM 4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 5:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM Page No.# 2/4 MINES AND MINERALS DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 6:THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM MINES AND MINERALS DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 7:THE COMMISSIONER GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION BUILDING UZANBAZAR GUWAHATI-01 8:THE TOWN PLANNER GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UZANBAZAR GUWAHATI-01 9:THE GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY GUWAHATI-05 BHANGAGARH ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. I C DEKA, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, FOREST BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date: 06.08.2025 Heard Mr. B. J. Talukdar, learned Senior Counsel representing the respondent nos. 1, 5 & 6 and Mr. D. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Forest Department, representing the respondent nos. 2 & 3 as well as Mr. P. Nayak, learned Addl. Advocate General, Assam, representing the respondent nos. 4, 7, 8 & 9. 2. The petitioner herein has approached this Court challenging the communication Page No.# 3/4 dated 02.03.2023 issued by the Joint Secretary to the Government of Assam, Mines and Minerals Department, Dispur to the Commissioner & Secretary to the Government of Assam, Housing & Urban Affairs Department as well as the directions issued by the respondent Nos. 7 & 9 for deposit of an amount on account of royalty on the basis of the impugned communication dated 02.03.2023. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is constructing a multistoried commercial building at Barbari, Hengrabari, Guwahati-26 and the issue involved in the present proceedings is directly covered by the judgment of this Court dated 24.09.2024 in the case of Amar Deka & Another Vs The State of Assam & 6 Others, reported in (2024) SCC OnLine Gau 1615. 4. This Court has duly taken note of the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Amar Deka & Another (supra) and the issue involved in the present proceedings appears to be squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Amar Deka & Another (supra). It is further relevant to take note that in the case of Amar Deka & Another (supra), this Court had already set aside and quashed the communication dated 02.03.2023 which has been impugned in the instant proceedings. 5. Consequently, there is no requirement for further quashing the impugned communication which already stands set aside and quashed in view of the judgment of this Court in the case of Amar Deka & Another (supra). 6. This Court further directs the respondent Nos. 7 & 9 not to insist upon payment of royalty on the basis of the impugned communication dated 02.03.2023 and further directs the said respondent Nos. 7 & 9 to process the issuance of the No Objection Certificate in accordance with law in terms with the above observations. 7. With the above, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. Page No.# 4/4 JUDGE Comparing Assistant