Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90821 (PNJ)

BALWAN SINGH v. ANIL DAHIYA ENGINEER IN CHIEF PWD ( B&R)

COCP/3519/2024 · 2025-03-21

Harkesh Manuja

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

122 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA BALWAN SINGH ANIL DAHIYA ENGINEER IN CHIEF PWD ( B&R) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Ms. Jai Shree Kaushik, Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA Learned State coun that the order passed by the Writ Court has been Supreme Court in SLP(C) vide diary In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition at this stage, however, with liberty to seek revival of the present petition, subject to final outcome of the Dismissed as not pressed with Rule stands discharged. 21.03.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: BALWAN SINGH Versus ANIL DAHIYA ENGINEER IN CHIEF PWD ( B&R) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Ms. Jai Shree Kaushik, Advocate for the Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel representing the respondent that the order passed by the Writ Court has been Supreme Court in SLP(C) vide diary No.49036/2024 In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition at this stage, however, with liberty to seek revival of the present petition, subject to final outcome of the Dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. Rule stands discharged. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3519-2024 Date of Decision: March 21, 2025 ........Petitioner ANIL DAHIYA ENGINEER IN CHIEF PWD ( B&R) ........Respondent HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana. sel representing the respondent informs that the order passed by the Writ Court has been stayed by the Hon’ble No.49036/2024 In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition at this stage, however, with liberty to seek revival of the present petition, subject to final outcome of the SLP. the aforesaid liberty. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2024 March 21, 2025 informs stayed by the Hon’ble In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition at this stage, however, with liberty to seek TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.03.21 13:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document