Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90809 (PNJ)

PARDEEP KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHERS

CWP/24475/2025 · 2025-08-22

Rohit Kapoor, To Be Nominated

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Pardeep Kumar (Retd.) State of Haryana CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Mr. Ajit Pal Singh Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, Sr. DAG, Haryana. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA 1. Prayer in the petition is for the issuance of appropriate direction to respondent No.1 to grant the benefit of 5 years’ experience of qualifying superannuation under Rule 4.2A of the Punjab Civil Serv II for pension and DCRG. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the p already filed a representation on 11.11.2022, praying for grant of five years experience to be added towards qualifying superannuation unde of the Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume submitted that though sufficient time has expired yet the competent authority has not examined the petitioner’s claim in that regard. 3. Learned counsel for the r petitioner can be accorded consideration in accordance with law. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-24475 Date of Decision: Pardeep Kumar (Retd.) V. State of Haryana and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Manipal Singh Yadav, Advocate for Mr. Ajit Pal Singh, Advocate for the Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (Oral) Prayer in the petition is for the issuance of appropriate direction to respondent No.1 to grant the benefit of 5 years’ experience of qualifying superannuation under Rule 4.2A of the Punjab Civil Serv II for pension and DCRG. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the p already filed a representation on 11.11.2022, praying for grant of five years experience to be added towards qualifying superannuation unde of the Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume-II, for pension and gratuity. It is submitted that though sufficient time has expired yet the competent authority has not examined the petitioner’s claim in that regard. Learned counsel for the respondents states that such claim of the petitioner can be accorded consideration in accordance with law. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 24475-2025 (O&M) ate of Decision: 22.08.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA ROHIT KAPOOR Manipal Singh Yadav, Advocate for , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Prayer in the petition is for the issuance of appropriate direction to respondent No.1 to grant the benefit of 5 years’ experience of qualifying superannuation under Rule 4.2A of the Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already filed a representation on 11.11.2022, praying for grant of five years experience to be added towards qualifying superannuation under Rule 2.4A II, for pension and gratuity. It is submitted that though sufficient time has expired yet the competent authority has not examined the petitioner’s claim in that regard. espondents states that such claim of the petitioner can be accorded consideration in accordance with law. Prayer in the petition is for the issuance of appropriate direction to respondent No.1 to grant the benefit of 5 years’ experience of qualifying - etitioner has already filed a representation on 11.11.2022, praying for grant of five years r Rule 2.4A II, for pension and gratuity. It is submitted that though sufficient time has expired yet the competent authority espondents states that such claim of the RAJESH KUMAR 2025.08.26 10:40 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-24475-2025 (O&M) [2] 4. In that view of the matter and without commenting upon the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, we dispose of the writ petition with direction to second respondent to accord consideration to the petitioner’s claim by passing reasoned order within three months. Liberty stands reserved to the petitioner to submit a fresh comprehensive representation along with other documents in support of his claim together with a copy of this order, within two weeks from today. 5. All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) JUDGE (ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE 22.08.2025 rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No 2. Whether reportable? : Yes/No RAJESH KUMAR 2025.08.26 10:40 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.