KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION v. SRI ERANNA
MFA/5762/2018 · 2025-11-10
Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 90801 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 90801 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45598-DB MFA No. 5762 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.5762 OF 2018 (SFC)
BETWEEN:
KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION BRANCH OFFICE: CHITRADURGA BEHIND BASAVESHWARA TALKIES ROAD, CHITRADURGA - 577 501.
REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VINAYA KUMAR G. S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SRI ERANNA MAJOR S/O CHIKKANNA PROPRIETOR M/S. GOVINDARAJ INDUSTRIES R/AT DOOR NO.652 UPPARAHATTY VILLAGE CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 501.
2.
K. G. THIPPESWAMY SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
SMT. K.T.GOWRAMMA
Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45598-DB MFA No. 5762 of 2018
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, W/O LATE K. T. THIPPESWAMY
3.
SRI K. T. SURENDRA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O LATE K. T. THIPPESWAMY
RESPONDENT NO.2 & 3 ARE RESIDENTS OF THYAGARAJA NAGAR EXTENTION, CHALLAKERE - 577522. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.M.SIDDAPPA, ADV. FOR R2 & R3)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 32 (9) OF STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION'S ACT 1951, AGAINST THE ORDER AND AWARD DATED 16.04.2018 PASSED IN CIVIL MISC.NO.148/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHITRADURGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 31(1)(A) AND (AA) OF STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION ACT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45598-DB MFA No. 5762 of 2018
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL)
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal.
2. The memo dated 30.10.2025 reads as under;
"Appellant humbly submits as follows; Respondents have approached the Appellant Corporation, availed the facility of One Time Settlement and paid the amounts as per OTS approved amount to Appellant Corporation. Hence, Appellant may be permitted to withdraw the said appeal in the interest of Justice."
3. In view of the same, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE
PN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33