Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9080 (JHR)

RAVINDRA KUMAR RAUT ALIAS RAVINDRA RAUT v. BHARAT COKING COAL LTD. THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR

WPC/2162/2025 · 2025-05-08

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:13931 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 2162 of 2025 -- Ravindra Kumar Raut @ Ravindra Raut, Aged about 58 years, S/o Late Jagannath Raut, R/o Ganesh Nawada, P.O.- Arsar, P.S.-Jamui, Dist.- Jamui, Bihar and at present R/o Putki- Srinagar, Devi Mandir, P.O. & P.S.-Kusunda, Dist.- Dhanbad, Jharkhand. .......Petitioner. Versus 1. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (in short M/S BCCL) through its Chairman cum Managing Director having office at Koyla Nagar, P.O. & P.S.-Saraidhela, Dist.- Dhanbad 2. Director of Personnel, M/S BCCL, Kayla Nagar, P.O. & P.S.- Saraidhela, Dist. Dhanbad. 3. The General Manager (P & IR), M/S BCCL, P.O. & P.S.- Saraidhela, Dist. Dhanbad. 4. The Chief General Manager, P.B. Area, M/S BCCL, P.O. & P.S.-Putki, Dist. Dhanbad. 5. Area Personnel Manager, Putki, Balihari Area, M/S BCCL, P.O. & P.S.- Putki, Dist.- Dhanbad. 6. General Manager, Putki, Balihari Area, M/S BCCL, P.O. & P.S.- Putki, Dist. Dhanbad. 7. Ganga Devi, W/o Late Bali Chand Raut, R/o Village Ganesh Nawada, P.O. –Arsar, P.S. & Dist.- Jamui, Bihar 8. Sunita Devi, D/o Late Bali Chand Raut, R/o Village Ganesh Nawada, P.O.-Arsar, P.S. & Dist.- Jamui, Bihar 9. Sujata Kumari, D/o Late Bali Chand Raut, R/o Village Ganesh Nawada, P.O.-Arsar, P.S & Dist.- Jamui, Bihar 10. Anshu Kumari, D/o Late Bali Chand Raut, R/O Village Ganesh Nawada, P.O.-Arsar, P.S. & Dist. Jamui, Bihar 11. Mahadeo Kumar Raut, S/o Late Bali Chand Raut, R/o Village Ganesh Nawada, P.O.- Arsar, P.S. & Dist. Jamui, Bihar. 12. Govind Kumar Raut, S/o Late Bali Chand Raut, R/o Village Ganesh Nawada, P.O.-Arsar, P.S. & Dist.- Jamui, Bihar ......Respondents --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Resp.-BCCL : Mr. Kumar Harsh, Advocate - 02/08.05.2025 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition in order to raise his grievance before the appropriate authority. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty, as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J.) jk