Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90799 (PNJ)

VIKAS NARANG v. SHAKUNTALA DEVI AND ORS.

CR/5160/2022 · 2025-07-07

Vikas Bahl

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMs-8569-70-CII-2025 in/and -1- CR-5160-2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (113) CMs-8569-70-CII-2025 in/and CR-5160-2022 Date of decision: - 07.07.2025 Vikas Narang ....Petitioner Versus Shakuntala Devi and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Sharad Mehra, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate for non-applicant/respondent No.1. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) CM-8569-CII-2025 1. Application is allowed, as prayed for. CM-8570-CII-2025 1. This is an application under Order IX Rule 9 read with Section 151 CPC for revival of the revision petition which was dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 21.04.2025. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed. The order dated 21.04.2025 is recalled and the main petition is restored to its original number. CR-5160-2022 (O&M) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the NARESH KUMAR 2025.07.08 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement CMs-8569-70-CII-2025 in/and -2- CR-5160-2022 petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present revision petition with liberty to raise all pleas which are available to him during the course of trial. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. ( VIKAS BAHL ) July 07, 2025 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.07.08 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement