HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7135 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Case called out. Counsel for the informant is not present. 2. Heard counsel for the applicants, Sri Neeraj Kumar Sharma, learned AGA for the State and perused the material on record. 3. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 357 dated 05.06.2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109(1), 3(5) of B.N.S., Police Station- Lisari Gate, District- Meerut. 4. Counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case. As per the first information report, the co- accused, Junaid (son of Shamshad) is alleged to have caused firearm injury to the injured [Junaid (son of Anees)]. The case of the applicants is clearly distinguishable from that of co-accused Junaid. During the course of investigation, other co-accused have been granted interim protection till submission of police report by this Court vide order dated 19.06.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 12958 of 2025 (Sameer and another vs. State of U.P. and 2 others). Investigation has been completed. Charge-sheet has been filed. The applicants had cooperated in the investigation. The applicants have been summoned by the concerned court. No custodial interrogation is required. The applicants have no criminal antecedents. The applicants have apprehension of their arrest in the above mentioned case. In case, the applicants are granted anticipatory bail, they will not misuse the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Syed Abbas Shaukat Abidi, Syed Ahmed Faizan, Syed Ali Shaukat (Abidi) Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Vivek Singh Ubaid And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) said liberty. 5. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 6. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations, antecedents of the applicants and the fact that as per the first information report, the co-accused, Junaid (son of Shamshad) is alleged to have caused firearm injury to the injured [Junaid (son of Anees)], during the course of investigation, other co-accused have been granted interim protection till submission of police report by this Court, charge-sheet has been filed, the applicants had cooperated in the investigation and no custodial interrogation is required, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicants are entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 7. In the event of arrest, the applicants Ubaid and Sameer, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) the applicants shall make themselves available on each date fixed in the matter by the court concerned; (ii) the applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court; (iii) the applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passport the same shall be deposited by them before the concerned court. 8. In default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same. 9. The application stands disposed of. NABAIL No. 7135 of 2025 2 September 9, 2025 Sachin Mishra NABAIL No. 7135 of 2025 3 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad