CRM-M-60301-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 267 MOHD ABBAS STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral) 1. under Sections Sanhita, 2023 and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 2. learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their statements with regard to compromise dated 1 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ABBAS AND ORS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Mr. Jugraj Singh Chouhan, Advocate Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sagar Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Himanshu Rajput, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. *** Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral) Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 190, 191(2) and 351(2) Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Yamuna Nagar Sadar, District Yamuna Nagar and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 29.09.2025. On 30.10.2025, this Court directed the parties to appear before learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their statements with regard to compromise dated 29.09.2025. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-60301-2025 Date of decision: 10.09.2026 …PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL , Advocate for Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Advocate Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG, Haryana. Sagar Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Himanshu Rajput, Advocate quashing of FIR No.252 dated 14.07.2025 115(2), 118(1), 190, 191(2) and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Yamuna Nagar Sadar, District Yamuna Nagar and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of this Court directed the parties to appear before learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their statements with .2026 14.07.2025 Nyaya Yamuna Nagar Sadar, District Yamuna Nagar and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of this Court directed the parties to appear before learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their statements with JYOTI 2026.09.10 19:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-60301-2025 3. learned Judicial Division), Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri Investigating Officer Learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Division), Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri satisfaction that all the parties have entered into a valid compromise without any influence or coercion. R 1. 2. 3. 4. 4. factum of compromise. Since the matter has been amicably resolved, continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility. 5. Judgment of this Court in and another” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 “Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others”(2012) 10 SCC 303, petition is allowed. 2 2025 In compliance of the aforesaid order, parties appeared before Judicial Magistrate First Class-cum Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri on Investigating Officer SI Lakhwinder Masih Judicial Magistrate First Class-cum Division), Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, has submitted satisfaction that all the parties have entered into a valid compromise without nfluence or coercion. Report as under has been submitted: Number of persons arrayed as accused in the FIR Whether any accused is proclaimed offender Stage of the trial/proceedings Whether the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence Learned State counsel has not raised any dispute regarding the factum of compromise. Since the matter has been amicably resolved, continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility. Following principles of law laid down by the Full Judgment of this Court in “Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 “Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others”(2012) 10 SCC 303, petition is allowed. In compliance of the aforesaid order, parties appeared before cum-Additional Civil Judge(Senior on 28.11.2025. Statement of Lakhwinder Masih was recorded on 29.11.2025. cum-Additional Civil Judge(Senior has submitted her report recording satisfaction that all the parties have entered into a valid compromise without eport as under has been submitted: Number of persons arrayed as 6 Whether any accused is No Stage of the trial/proceedings Investigation pending and challan not received Whether the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue Yes not raised any dispute regarding the factum of compromise. Since the matter has been amicably resolved, continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility. Following principles of law laid down by the Full Bench “Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Hon’ble Supreme Court in “Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others”(2012) 10 SCC 303, the In compliance of the aforesaid order, parties appeared before Additional Civil Judge(Senior Statement of . Additional Civil Judge(Senior report recording satisfaction that all the parties have entered into a valid compromise without not raised any dispute regarding the factum of compromise. Since the matter has been amicably resolved, Bench “Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and Hon’ble Supreme Court in the JYOTI 2026.09.10 19:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-60301-2025 6. 190, 191(2) and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Yamuna Nagar Sadar, District Yamuna Nagar proceedings arising therefrom, are quashed qua the of compromise dated 7. 10.09.2026 Jyoti-V 3 2025 FIR No.252 dated 14.07.2025 190, 191(2) and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Yamuna Nagar Sadar, District Yamuna Nagar proceedings arising therefrom, are quashed qua the of compromise dated 29.09.2025. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable : dated 14.07.2025 under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 190, 191(2) and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Yamuna Nagar Sadar, District Yamuna Nagar and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are quashed qua the petitioners, on the basis Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 115(2), 118(1), Police Station and all consequential basis (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JYOTI 2026.09.10 19:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document