Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90775 (PAT)

Kumar Vidhan Chandra v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/930/2024 · 2025-02-18

Arvind Singh Chandel

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.930 of 2024 ====================================================== 1. Kumar Vidhan Chandra S/o Late Lala Singh R/o Phari No.-2, Ward No.-13, P.S.- Gangjala, District- Saharasa (Bihar) 2. Pintu Paswan S/o Ojir Paswan R/o Phari No.-2 Habibullahchak, P.S.- Narsanda, District- Nalanda (Bihar) 3. Ajay Kumar Mahto S/o Mahadeo Mahto R/o Poonam Cinema Road, PO- Lalbagh, P.S.- Town, district- Darbhanga (Bihar) 4. Ganesh Razak S/o Moti Rajak R/o Vill and PO- Purani Bazar, Ward No.-3, P.S.- Madhepura, Sadar, District- Madhepura (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. Principal Secretary Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The Under Secretary Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna 4. The Special Secretary Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna 5. Joint Commissioner Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna 6. District Magistrate Saharsa ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiv Pratap For the Respondent/s : Mr. Birendra Prasad Singh AC to SC - 19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL ORAL ORDER 4 18-02-2025 At the length of argument, learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw this petition seeking liberty to file a fresh representation before the concerned respondent/ respondents raising all grounds which they raised in this writ petition and in turn, the concerned respondents may also be directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner within the stipulated period fixed by this Court. Patna High Court CWJC No.930 of 2024(4) dt.18-02-2025 2/2 2. The above prayer made by the counsel for the petitioners is not opposed by the counsel for the respondents. 3. Taking into consideration the above submission made by both the counsels, the petition is disposed of. The petitioners are directed to make their fresh representation before the concerned respondent/respondents raising all grounds which he raised in this writ petition and any other grounds which they desire to be raised. It will be done within a period of four weeks from today and in turn, the concerned respondent/respondents is also directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with relevant rules and law as early as possible preferably within 90 days from the date of submission of such application. shailendra/- (Arvind Singh Chandel , J) U