IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1958 of 2025 ------ 1. Ritesh Yadav @ Ritesh Kumar Yadav, aged about 21 years, son of Bishamabar Yadav, resident of Manikpura, Pandepur, P.O. & P.S. and District- Latehar. 2. Atul Kumar, aged about 20 years, son of Mukesh Kumar, resident of ward no. 11, gram Chandandih P.O. & P.S. and District- Latehar. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate Ms. Priyanka Agrawal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Saket Kumar, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-26-03-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No.130 of 2024 instituted under Sections 126/191(3)/190/118(2)/109(1) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were members of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of common object of the assembly, attempted to murder the informant and his brother. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and only abrasion has been sustained by the alleged victim. It is then submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the main allegation is against Vaibhav Pandey. It is then submitted that the co-accused person, with similar allegations, has already been given the privileges of anticipatory bail by this court vide order dated 10.03.2025 passed in A.B.A. No.1589 of 2025. It is further submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant, victim or any of their family members in any manner during pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Latehar in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No.130 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and they will not to annoy or disturb the informant, victim or any of their family members in any manner during pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/