HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30406 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner has come up in the present writ petition with a sole prayer that a direction be issued to the respondent no.2-District Magistrate, Baghpat to decide the Case No.963 of 2024 (Computerised Case No.D202411080000963), under Section 70 of U.P. Cooperative Society Act, 1965 (Sahdev Vs. Smt. Niket Verma and Others) pending before him expeditiously within a time bound period. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioners. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without going into the merits of the case and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed off with a direction to the respondent no.2-District Magistrate, Baghpat to decide the Case No.963 of 2024 (Computerised Case No.D202411080000963), under Section 70 of U.P. Cooperative Society Act, 1965 (Sahdev Vs. Smt. Niket Verma and Others) pending before him expeditiously without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. September 11, 2025 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Sahdev .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad