CWP-23510-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 138 PARDEEP KUMAR STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. Khalid Tauru for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The mandamus directing the respondents to area in order to enable him 2. Learned counsel for the herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner decide the pending specified period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate General, Haryana notice on behalf of the respondents representation, dated respondent/Additional Chief Secretary speaking/reasoned months. 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: PARDEEP KUMAR Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Khalid Tauru, Advocate for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia directing the respondents to Post/transfer in order to enable him to complete his rural service Learned counsel for the petitioner herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this petitioner will be satisfied in case pending representation, dated 03.03 specified period. Notice of motion. Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate General, Haryana notice on behalf of the respondents/State , dated 03.03.2025, will be decided by Additional Chief Secretary, Government of Haryana, /reasoned order in accordance with law within IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23510-2025 Date of Decision: 13.08.2025 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA inter alia, seeking a writ of /transfer the petitioner to a rural to complete his rural service. petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this atisfied in case first respondent is directed to 03.03.2025, Annexure P-8, in a Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, accepts and submits that the pending will be decided by the first Government of Haryana, by passing a order in accordance with law within a period of three seeking a writ of rural submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this is directed to a accepts the pending first by passing a three Aman Dua 2025.08.18 14:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-23510-2025 5. In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being dis 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of 13.08.2025 Ad 2025 -2- In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the r concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner posed of in terms thereof. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No rned counsel for the petitioner In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ) Aman Dua 2025.08.18 14:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document