Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90739 (ALL)

ASHISH KUMAR GOYAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/33259/2025 · 2025-09-10

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 33259 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. This application has been filed by the applicant to quash the entire proceeding, charge sheet dated 30.04.2024 as well as summoning order dated 01.08.2024 in Case no. 14164/2024 (State vs. Ashish Kumar Goyal and others) arising out of Case Crime no. 70 of 2024 under Section 66 IT Act, PS- Cantt, District Bareilly. 3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he relinquishes the prayer for quashment and wishes to move bail application before the trial court in view of the guidelines/observations given by Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2021) 10 SCC 773. 4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer so made. 5. Considering the above submissions and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that in case the applicant appears before the court concerned within three weeks from today and move application for bail, if there is no other legal impediment before learned court concerned, the same shall be considered and disposed of in terms of the guidelines/observations given by Hon'ble Apex Court in Satendra Kumar Antil (supra). 6. For a period of three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lalit Prakash, Lavlesh Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ashish Kumar Goyal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) against the applicant. 7. It is made clear that in the event no such application is moved within the time prescribed above, this order will be of no avail to the applicant. 8. With the above direction, the instant application stands disposed of. However, it is made clear that none of the grounds are convincing for seeking quashing of orders impugned along with entire proceeding. September 11, 2025 Shaswat NA528 No. 33259 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad