- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52684 CRL.RP No. 1873 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1873 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI VIJAYAKUMAR R SALKUTE S/O LATE SRI. RAMBHAU SALKUTE AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/A NO.301, 2ND FLOOR, "PYRAMID MAHIKA", SHIVANAHALLI, JAKKUR MAIN ROAD, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. …PETITIONER (BY SRI PARASHURAM A L., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. MRUNAL V SALKUTE, W/O SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR R SALKUTE, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 2. SRI ASHUTOSH V SALKUTE, S/O SRI VIJAYAKUMAR R SALKUTE, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, 3. SRI AVANEESH V SALKUTE, S/O SRI VIJAYAKUMAR R SALKUTE, AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS, BEING MINOR - REP. BY HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, SMT. MRUNAL V SALKUTE ALL ARE R/A NO.301, 2ND FLOOR, "PYRAMID MAHIKA", Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52684 CRL.RP No. 1873 of 2025 SHIVANAHALLI, JAKKUR MAIN ROAD, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE LEARNED LV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-56) DATED 17.09.2025 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 29/2024. B. SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (TRAFFIC COURT-VI), BENGALURU DATED 26.12.2023 IN CRL.MISC.NO.50/2023 AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS I.A NO.2 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Challenging judgment dated 17.09.2025 passed by LV Addl.City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in Crl.A.no.29/2024 confirming order dated 26.12.2023 passed by Metropolitan Magistrate First Class (Traffic Court-VI) in Crl.Misc.no.50/2023, this revision petition is filed. 2. Sri AL Parashuram, learned counsel for petitioner submitted, impugned order is not challenged insofar as quantum of maintenance and even challenge insofar as - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52684 CRL.RP No. 1873 of 2025 direction to pay maintenance from date of petition, was limited to seeking extension of time to pay by three months. 3. Noting submission, made on instructions from petitioner, who is present in Court, condition in impugned order is modified, petitioner shall pay arrears of maintenance within three months from today. With above observations and since there is no interference with impugned order on merits, revision petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 55