- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35954 WP No. 19917 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 19917 OF 2023 (LR) BETWEEN: SMT. S. SHAMEEM K M W/O FAKRUDEEN SHARIF AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/A NO.27-177/1/2/2 REHAMAN NAGAR PUNGANOOR-517247 CHITTOOR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIRI.K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU – 560 002. 2. THE TAHASILDAR BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU – 560 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K. MANJUNATH, HCGP) THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUITON OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE LRF (83) (AK) 06/2015-16, DTD 31.08.2018 AT ANNEXURE-A, ISSUED BY THE R1, FORFEITING THE LAND IN SY.149/1, MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 0.05.8 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT INDLAVADIPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLIL, ANEKAL TALUK, THROUGH A SALE DEED DTD 09.03.2012, REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NO. ANK-1-05269/2011-12, STORE IN CD.NO.ANKD308, IN THE OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, ANEKAL AND ANNEXURE-B. Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35954 WP No. 19917 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for respondents. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of forfeiture dated 31.08.2018 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengaluru, under the provisions of Section 83 for violation of the provisions contained in Sections 79-A and 79-B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that this is a case where the impugned order of forfeiture has been passed by the Assistant Commissioner without notice to the petitioner. It is further submitted that under similar circumstances, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.7821/2021 has passed an order dated 16.08.2021 remanding the matter back to the Assistant Commissioner - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35954 WP No. 19917 of 2023 for fresh consideration after affording an opportunity of hearing to the aggrieved person. 4. Learned High Court Government Pleader points out from the impugned order that notice was indeed issued to the petitioner and in spite of notice having been issued, the petitioner did not appear before the Assistant Commissioner. 5. Admittedly, as on the date of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020, no proceedings were pending before any court/authority. 6. This Court had several occasions to consider such cases, where writ petitions are filed long after the provisions contained in Sections 79A, 79B and 79C were omitted from the statute book in terms of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Second Amendment) Act, 2020. It is the consistent opinion of this Court that if at any rate, the Assistant Commissioner, after forfeiting the land has not disposed of the same in accordance with law, then the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35954 WP No. 19917 of 2023 benefit of the saving clause contained in Section 12 of the Amending Act is required to be given to such petitioners. The Assistant Commissioner is therefore, required to ascertain, whether the declared excess lands or forfeited lands still remain with the State Government or has been granted to third parties. If the lands have been granted to third party, then sub-section(1) of Section 12 of the amending Act will apply to say that the proceedings have reached finality. Or otherwise, sub-section (2) of Section 12 of the Amending Act will apply and all further proceedings shall be declared as abated by the Assistant Commissioner. 7. Having considered the submission of the learned Counsels and on perusing the judgment of the co-ordinate Bench in W.P.No.7821/2021, this Court finds that facts and circumstances in both these matters are quite similar and therefore, the benefit of the decision of the co- ordinate bench should also enure to the petitioner herein. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35954 WP No. 19917 of 2023 8. Accordingly, this Court proceeds to pass the following: ORDER i) The writ petition is disposed of. ii) The matter is remanded back to the respondent - Assistant Commissioner to consider the case of the petitioner including the consequences of the subsequent amendment brought to the provisions of Sections 79-A and 79-B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act in Karnataka Amendment No.56 of 2020. iii) If revenue entries have been altered pursuant to the impugned order dated 31.08.2018, the same shall be restored in favour of the petitioner. iv) The petitioner shall appear before the respondent-Assistant Commissioner on - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35954 WP No. 19917 of 2023 08.10.2025, without waiting for further notice from the Assistant Commissioner. Ordered accordingly. 9. Learned High Court Government Pleader is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE BMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16