Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90705 (PNJ)

AKBAR SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR

CRM-M/44128/2025 · 2025-08-13

Alok Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (121) AKBAR SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. impugned order dated 29.07.2025 passed by learned Sessions Judge, SBS Nagar . 2. submits that there are certain typographical errors petition. Accordingly, he prays for withdrawal of the same, with liberty to file a fresh petition with better and complete particulars 3. withdrawn with the afores 4. on the merits of the case August 13, 2025 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AKBAR SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Gaurav Datta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed for quashing of the impugned order dated 29.07.2025 passed by learned Sessions Judge, SBS After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are certain typographical errors petition. Accordingly, he prays for withdrawal of the same, with liberty to file a fresh petition with better and complete particulars In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. August 13, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No her Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-44128-2025 Date of Decision:- 13.08.2025 ……petitioner ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Mr. Gaurav Datta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed for quashing of the impugned order dated 29.07.2025 passed by learned Sessions Judge, SBS After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are certain typographical errors and defects in the present petition. Accordingly, he prays for withdrawal of the same, with liberty to file a fresh petition with better and complete particulars. In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 13.08.2025 ……petitioner ……Respondents The present petition has been filed for quashing of the impugned order dated 29.07.2025 passed by learned Sessions Judge, SBS After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner and defects in the present petition. Accordingly, he prays for withdrawal of the same, with liberty to In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion MANJU 2025.08.18 13:45 I agree to specified portions of this document