Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90702 (PAT)

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Chaurasiya v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./2125/2025 · 2025-05-12

Chandra Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2125 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-157 Year-2017 Thana- INDUSTRIAL AREA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Chaurasiya S/o Brajnanadan Prasad Resident of Village- Basanta Jehanabad, PS- Lalganj, District- Vaishali at hajipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Niranjan Parihar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 12-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. No. 782 of 2024 arising out of Industrial Area P.S. Case No. 157 of 2017 dated 14.10.2017 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 25 (1-B)a and 26 of the Arms Act and sections 10,11, 13, 18B and 20 UAP Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, a loaded country made pistol was recovered from the possession of the co- accused Chandan Gupta @ Subhash Gupta @ Chandan Jee @ Chandan. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2125 of 2025(4) dt.12-05-2025 2/3 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Similarly situated co-accused has already been granted bail by the co-ordinate bench of this court vide order dated 22.11.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 53220 of 2024. The petitioner has three criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 29.01.2024. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with S.T. No. 782 of 2024 arising out of Industrial Area P.S. Case No. 157 of 2017, with a condition/s:- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2125 of 2025(4) dt.12-05-2025 3/3 (i). MISC. No.2125 of 2025(4) dt.12-05-2025 3/3 (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled. 7. The application stands allowed. guddukr/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T