Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90694 (PNJ)

HARPREET SINGH v. K.S. KAHLON AND OTHERS

COCP/3603/2024 · 2025-03-21

Harkesh Manuja

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA HARPREET SINGH K.S. KAHLON AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Paramjit Singh Jammu, Advocate and Mr. Simranjot Sin Mr. M.K. Dogra, HARKESH MANUJA Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4 submits that appropriate orders on the repr petitioner shall be passed within a period of one week and the same shall be transmitted to the learned counsel for the petitioner on his e-mail and whatsapp. In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition and the same is thu Rule discharged. However, aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival the erring/concerned Rs.50,000/- as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. 21.03.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: HARPREET SINGH Versus K.S. KAHLON AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Paramjit Singh Jammu, Advocate and Mr. Simranjot Singh Gill, Advocate for the Mr. M.K. Dogra, Advocate for respondent Nos.1,3 and 4. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4 submits that appropriate orders on the representation dated 20.12.2023 petitioner shall be passed within a period of one week and the same shall be transmitted to the learned counsel for the petitioner on his mail and whatsapp. In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3603-2024 Date of Decision: March 21, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Paramjit Singh Jammu, Advocate and Advocate for the petitioner. respondent Nos.1,3 and 4. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4 submits that esentation dated 20.12.2023 filed by the petitioner shall be passed within a period of one week and the same shall be transmitted to the learned counsel for the petitioner on his In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 4 March 21, 2025 Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4 submits that ed by the petitioner shall be passed within a period of one week and the same shall be transmitted to the learned counsel for the petitioner on his In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be and in that eventuality, Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.03.21 13:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document