Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9069 (UTT)

MADARSA DAARUL HUDA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/2115/2025 · 2025-07-15

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS D/18 WPMS No.2115 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. It is the case of the petitioner that they run a Trust, under the Trust multiple activities are taken by the petitioner. The premises was sealed on 05.05.2025 without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that their premises has been sealed without affording an opportunity of hearing to them; the petitioner is now ready to give an undertaking that they would not run any Madarsa or Educational Centre in the premises, unless it is authorized. Learned State Counsel submits that if the petitioner gives such undertaking, the petition may be disposed of in terms thereof. The Court takes on record the statements given by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State Counsel. The writ petition is finally disposed of with the directions to the respondent authority to unseal the premises-in-question, subject to the petitioner giving an undertaking that he will not run any Madarsa or Educational Centre in the premises, unless he is authorised to do so by the State Government. In case, the petitioner makes any defiance to the undertaking given by him, the respondent authority shall be free to take such action, as is permissible under law. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 15.07.2025 Sanjay