Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90676 (ALL)

SANJAY YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIC/30911/2025 · 2025-09-14

Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar J Criminal, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30911 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhai Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2. 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit the amount due against him, in case he is permitted to do so in easy installments. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Bank, on instructions, submits that the total amount due against the petitioner is Rs. 8,55,982/-. He, however, states that the Bank is ready to accept the amount due. 4. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner has offered to pay the entire amount due against him and the Bank has agreed to accept the amount, in our view, ends of justice require that the petitioner be granted an opportunity to deposit the entire outstanding amount due against him in the following manner:- (i) The initial payment of 25% of the total outstanding amount shall be made by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from date. Upon receipt of the aforesaid amount, the Bank shall provide the balance amount payable by the petitioner and the same amount shall be paid to the Bank in four equal monthly installments starting from December, 2025. 5. Till the period prescribed for depositing the aforesaid amount, the recovery proceedings against the petitioner will be kept in abeyance. In case the petitioner defaults in depositing Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhay Pratap Singh, C.S.C. Sanjay Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) the initial amount or thereafter the installments within the stipulated period, it will be open for the respondents to start recovery proceedings against the petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 15, 2025 K.K. Maurya WRIC No. 30911 of 2025 2 (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- KAMLESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad