Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30607 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent No. 4 to comply the direction dated 15.12.2023 passed by District Magistrate, Bijnor strictly in accordance with law. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the private respondents not to interfere in the reconstruction of shop by the petitioner."
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has purchased a plot from respondent no. 5, over which he constructed a shop. However, it is alleged that respondent no. 5, by using muscle power, demolished the petitioner's shop.
4. Be that as it may, the petitioner has adequate remedies available under civil and criminal law. The issues raised in the present writ petition involve disputed questions of fact arising out of a private dispute between the petitioner and respondent no. 5. Such matters cannot be adjudicated by this Court in proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, as the dispute is essentially between two private parties. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandan Singh, Rajiv Kumar, Shardendu Mishra, Udai Singh Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Chhunnu .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. In such view of the fact, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy available under law. September 25, 2025 Gaurav WRIC No. 30607 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad