HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 12845 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Shiv Sharan Tripathi, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Vinay Kumar Singh, Advocate for respondents. 2. It is brought on record that claim of petitioner for terminal benefits, being wife of deceased, is pending before concerned respondent. 3. It is not in dispute that petitioner is beneficiary of compassionate appointment as well as the nominee is her mother-in-law, i.e., mother of deceased employee. 4. In view of above, as agreed by learned counsel for parties, the writ petition is disposed of with observation that both parties may appear before concerned respondent within a period of fifteen days from today so that rival claim be considered in accordance with law as well as taking note of a judgment passed by Supreme Court in the case of Shipra Sengupta vs Mridul Sengupta & Ors, AIR OnLine 2009 SC 408. September 1, 2025 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Sharan Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manu Ghildyal (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Pooja Kumari .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad