IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 215 (1) CRM-M-56038-2023 (O&M) Date of decision :26.03.2025 AMULYA PRADHAN ...... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. S. SHEKHAWAT *** Present :- Mr. Sudesh Kumar Pandey Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, DAG, Haryana. *** N. S. SHEKHAWAT, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has been convicted by the trial Court and therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Dismissed as having being rendered infructuous. All other pending applications, if any, are also disposed off, accordingly. ( N. S. SHEKHAWAT ) JUDGE 26.03.2025 vipin Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether Reportable : No VIPIN KUMAR 2025.03.27 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order