- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53060-DB WA No. 1883 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT APPEAL NO. 1883 OF 2025 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: 1. MR KRISHNAA SUBRAMANIAN AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, SON OF MR. K.K.SUBRAMANIAN, RESIDING AT NO. 203, BALDOTA LUXURIA APARTMENT, 21ST MAIN, 04TH CROSS, PADMANABHANAGAR, BSK - 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE-560070 …APPELLANT (BY MS.PRANJALI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. PRASHANTH.S.H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. PAVITHRA BALASUBRAMANIAN AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, Digitally signed by VEERENDRA KUMAR K M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53060-DB WA No. 1883 of 2025 WIFE OF MR. KRISHNAA SUBRAMANIAN, RESIDING AT: F-1, MEENAKSHI MANOR, 4TH CROSS, BSK - 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE-560085 PRESENTLY AT: NO.003, SAI SIRI COARL, RAVIL HILL VIEW LAYOUT, ITTMADU, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE-560085 …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HONBLE SINGLE JUDGE VIDE ORDER DATED 29/11/2024 PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO.17271/2024 AND ETC., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53060-DB WA No. 1883 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning the order dated 29.11.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.17271 of 2024. 2. The appellant had filed the said petition assailing an order dated 12.02.2024 passed by the VI Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru in M.C.No.3533 of 2022 partly allowing an application filed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The appellant is directed to pay monthly interim maintenance of Rs.20,000/- to the respondent. The appellant's challenge to the said order was rejected as the Court found no grounds for interfering with the same. We find no infirmity with the decision as well. 3. Since it is apparent that the impugned order was passed is in exercise of power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the present appeal may not be maintainable. 4. In any view of the matter, we find no infirmity with the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53060-DB WA No. 1883 of 2025 5. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. 6. The pending interlocutory applications also stand disposed of. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE VM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 26