Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90634 (KAR)

M/S KARLE INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

WP/21045/2022 · 2025-12-15

Jyoti M

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53161 WP No. 21045 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 21045 OF 2022 (L-PF) BETWEEN: M/S. KARLE INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMTIED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT,1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.151, INDUSTRIAL SUBURB, YESHWANTHPUR, BENGALURU-560022, REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR, SUDARSHAN KARLE. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KUMAR M.N., ADVOCATE) AND: ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, REGIONAL OFFICE, PEENYA, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, NO.62, 3RD CROSS ROAD, INDUSTRIAL SUBURB, YESHAWANTHPURA II STAGE, BENGALURU-560022. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. B.V.VIDYULATHA, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53161 WP No. 21045 of 2022 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Kumar M.N., counsel for the petitioner and Smt.B.V.Vidyulatha, counsel for the respondent have appeared in person. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as Infructuous. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about the petition having become infructuous and if an order is passed, the petitioner shall not seek recalling of the order or file a review petition. 3. The submission is placed on record. 4. The writ petition is dismiss as Infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37