( 2025:JHHC:10316 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.2158 of 2025 ------ Kaleshwar Yadav @ Kaleshwar Prasad Yadav, aged about- 38 years, Son of Bhulo Mahto, Resident of- Sakin, Barwadih, P.O+P.S- Tisri, District- Giridih, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Dev, Advocate Mr. Priyanshu Nilesh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shashi Kr. Verma, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-03-04-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Tisri P.S. Case No.29 of 2024 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 302/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, has committed murder to Sanju Devi. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this court towards Annexure-2, page-7 to 8 of the brief which is the certified copy of the joint compromise petitioner filed by the parties in the court of Addl. Sessions Judge-V, Giridih, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that therein the informant has categorically stated that due to misunderstanding, he has implicated the petitioner in this case and after coming to know the truth, he regretted his acts. It is then submitted that the post-mortem report goes to show that the death of the deceased was due to hanging which is contrary to the claim of the manner of the death of the deceased as made out in the FIR. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of the witnesses in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from the date of the order and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Giridih in connection with Tisri P.S. Case No.29 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of the witnesses in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/