HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30716 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned sale notice dated July 22, 2025 as well as possession notice dated November 12, 2024 issued by the respondents authority. 3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that for the relief sought in the present writ petition, the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy of filing a Securitisation Application before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. 4. In light of the same, we are of the view that there is no reason to interfere in this matter at this stage. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal for redressal of his grievance. September 11, 2025 Kuldeep Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kuldeep Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashish Agrawal, C.S.C., Dhyan Shanker Pandey (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Subhash Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad