CRM-M- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 127 GURJEET SINGH @JEETI & ANR. STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PRATAP SINGH Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’), for quashing the order dated Sessions Judge, of the petitioner forfeited to the State and warrant case pertaining to 323, 427, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code ‘IPC’) Police Station -44513-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH GURJEET SINGH @JEETI & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PRATAP SINGH Mr. Kulwinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner SURYA PRATAP SINGH, J (ORAL) This is a petition, filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’), for quashing the order dated 09.07.2025, (Annexure P-13 Judge, Mansa (hereinafter referre of the petitioners has been cancelled, their feited to the State and warrant of arrest has been issued against pertaining to FIR No.230 dated 26.08.2023 323, 427, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code Police Station Sadar Mansa, District Notice of motion. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-44513-2025 DECIDED ON: 18.08.202 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PRATAP SINGH , Advocate for the petitioners. This is a petition, filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’), for quashing the 13), passed by the Court of learned (hereinafter referred to as ‘trial Court’), whereby bail their bail/surety bonds have been of arrest has been issued against them, in 26.08.2023, under Sections 379-B, 341, 323, 427, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as , District Mansa. .2025 .....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENT This is a petition, filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’), for quashing the learned bail bail/surety bonds have been in a B, 341, (hereinafter referred to as GAURAV THAKUR 2025.08.19 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- notice on behalf of respondent had been miscommunication and misunderstanding the as 09.08.2025 not appear before the Court and the and forfeited proceeded to issue present petition is before the learned However, the learned trial Court would be at liberty to into custody and to provisions contained under Section 491 of BNSS (erstwhile Section 4 CrPC). Gaurav Thakur -44513-2025 Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab notice on behalf of respondent-State and waives service. Learned counsel for the petitioner had been regularly appearing before the learned trial Court, but due to munication and misunderstanding the .2025, instead of 09.07.2025. Resultantly, on not appear before the Court and the learned trial Court forfeited their surety bonds. The learned trial Court proceeded to issue non-bailable warrants against In view of above facts and circumstances present petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners before the learned trial Court within a period of However, the learned trial Court would be at liberty to into custody and to proceed against them provisions contained under Section 491 of BNSS (erstwhile Section 4 2 . Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts State and waives service. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner regularly appearing before the learned trial Court, but due to munication and misunderstanding the petitioners noted a wrong date esultantly, on 09.07.2025, they could learned trial Court cancelled their bail . The learned trial Court has further bailable warrants against the petitioners. facts and circumstances, detailed above, t disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to surrender a period of two weeks from today However, the learned trial Court would be at liberty to take the petitioners m as well as their surety(ies), as per provisions contained under Section 491 of BNSS (erstwhile Section 446 of , accepts the petitioners regularly appearing before the learned trial Court, but due to wrong date could bail further , the surrender from today. take the petitioners , as per 46 of GAURAV THAKUR 2025.08.19 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document