IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.95 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-372 Year-2024 Thana- NAWADA MUFFASIL District- Nawada ====================================================== 1. Kanahiya Kumar S/O Subodh Chouhan @ Subodh Kumar Resident of Village-Beldaria-Barbigha, P.S.-Jayrampur, District- Sheikhpura, 2. Rocky Kumar S/o Ravindra Sharma Resident of Village-Chhoti Murhari, P.S.-Harnaut, District-Nalanda. ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Beyas Muni S/o Sanjay Manjhi Resident of Village-Dedour Tola, Krishna Nagar at River, P.S.- Muffasil, District-Nawada.. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, SPP For the Informant : Mr. Rohit Kumar, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 3 30-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the Informant. Perused the case diary. 2. The instant appeal has been filed by the appellants against the order dated 18.11.2024 passed by learned Exclusive Special Judge, Special Court SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Nawada whereby the prayer for bail of the appellants in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 372 of 2024 under Sections 191(2), 193(3), 190, Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.95 of 2025(3) dt.30-01-2025 2/6 109(1), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 326(g), 303(2), 111(3), 61(2) (a) of the B.N.S., Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(1)(f)(g)(r)(s)(w), 3(2)(va), 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, was rejected. 3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the Informant and about 60 families of Krishna Nagar were living since 2015 in a small hut-like houses on government land by the river bearing Khata No. 226 and Plot 2278/2470. It is alleged that on September 18, 2024, at 6:30 PM, 60-70 named and unnamed individuals, armed with pistols, sticks and petrol, attacked the village, opened fire on the villagers as also assaulted them, including women and children. The attackers set on fire the houses, vandalized them and looted whatever money and valuables they found. When the villagers approached to save their property, all the attackers started firing upon them. Altogether, 35 homes including Informant’s were completely destroyed and looted. 4. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants are innocent and have falsely been implicated Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.95 of 2025(3) dt.30-01-2025 3/6 in the present case merely due to village politics. There is a pre-existing land dispute between the parties being Title Suit No. 22/1995. There is no specific or direct allegation of any overt act against the appellants rather the same is general and omnibus in nature. The appellants are not named in the F.I.R. and their names have transpired in this case in course of investigation. The appellants have no concern with the alleged occurrence. He further submits that co-accused Nandu Paswan is the main responsible person for the alleged occurrence. As per allegation made in the F.I.R., there was indiscriminate firing at the place of occurrence but, it is surprising to note herein that not a single person has sustained fire-arm injuries in the alleged occurrence. There is not a single eye-witness to the alleged occurrence who has seen the appellants of being indulged in the alleged occurrence. There is not an iota of evidence which shows the indulgence of the appellants in the alleged occurrence. The appellants are in custody since 17.10.2024. The appellants have no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned Special P.P. for the State and the Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.95 of 2025(3) dt.30-01-2025 4/6 Informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the appellants, stating that the offence alleged against the appellants are serious in nature. As per allegation, the appellants are part of land Mafia syndicate and are accused of forcibly attempting to evict the Informant and others from their homes, illegally occupying government land using forged documents and generating substantial profits from these criminal activities. The police has also recovered altogether four shells, two pellets as also misfired .315 bullet from the place of occurrence. The offence alleged is a heinous crime in which the homes of approximately sixty families were set on fire by the accused persons including the appellants. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the offence alleged is a heinous crime in which the altogether homes of 60 families were set on fire by the accused persons including the appellants. It appears that the attempts have been made by the accused persons including the appellants of illegally removing the Informant’s side from their houses. The incident implies organized crime as large number of individuals are the subject of accusations, Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.95 of 2025(3) dt.30-01-2025 5/6 potentially involving threats, corruption and fraudulent activities to acquire the land in which 35 houses were completely destroyed by setting on fire in a planned manner and also looted the valuables from the place of occurrence. The Investigating Officer, after conclusion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet against the appellants for offence under Sections 191(2), 193(3), 190, 109(1), 352, 351(2), 326(g), 303(2), 111(3), 61(2)(a) of the B.N.S., Sections 27 and 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(1) (f)(g)(r)(s)(w), 3(2)(va), 3(2)(iv) and 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. 7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account the nature and gravity of the offence, this Court, at this stage, is not inclined to allow this appeal. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the appellants is hereby rejected. 8. In the result, the appeal stands dismissed with a direction to the court below to expedite the trial and conclude the same expeditiously. Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.95 of 2025(3) dt.30-01-2025 6/6 9. The District Magistrate, Nawada and the Superintendent of Police, Nawada are hereby directed to ensure presence of the witnesses on time as and when required by the learned court below. 10. Let a copy of this order be sent to the District Magistrate, Nawada and the Superintendent of Police, Nawada for strict compliance of this order. rishi/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T