Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90591 (KAR)

SMT. KEMPAMMA v. THE TAHSILDAR

WP/14834/2025 · 2025-09-11

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36095 WP No. 14834 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.14834 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SMT. KEMPAMMA W/O. LATE SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/A GUDDENAHALLI VILLAGE HONAKERE HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 432. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SURENDRA KUMAR N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TAHSILDAR NAGAMANGALA MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 432. 2. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS NAGAMANGALA, NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 432. 3. SRI RAMU S/O. CHIKKEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 4. SRI HELAVEGOWDA S/O. LATE CHIKKEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36095 WP No. 14834 of 2025 5. SRI C. SREENIVAS S/O. LATE CHIKKEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS. 6. SRI RAMESH S/O. LATE CHIKKEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS.3 TO 6 ARE R/A GUDDENAHALLI VILLAGE HONAKERE HOBLI NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 431. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V. SESHU, H.C.G.P., FOR R-1 AND R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-1 AND 2 CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 23/04/2021 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E AND THEREBY INCORPORATE HER NAME IN SY.NO.16/14 MEASURING 0-14½ GUNTAS IN POSSESSION COLUMN OF RTC AND SIMILARLY INCORPORATE HER NAME IN SY.NO.16/12 MEASURING 0-08 GUNTAS IN POSSESSION COLUMN RTC, BOTH SITUATED AT GUDDENAHALLI VILLAGE, HONAKERE HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for respondents Nos.1 and 2. Notice to other respondents is not necessary for the following reasons: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36095 WP No. 14834 of 2025 Learned High Court Government Pleader raises a preliminary objection that the petitioner is seeking directions to the Tahsildar, Nagamangala Taluk, to consider the grievance of the petitioner to remove the names reflected in Column No.12 of the RTC in respect of Sy.Nos.16/10, 16/12 and 16/14, all situated at Guddenahalli village, Honakere Hobli, Nagamangala Taluk, Mandya District. Learned High Court Government Pleader further submits that such directions cannot be issued without hearing the concerned parties and that can be done only by way of a duly constituted appeal filed at the hands of the petitioner. 2. Upholding the submissions of the learned High Court Government Pleader, the writ petition stands disposed of while reserving liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal in accordance with law for redressal of her grievance. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36095 WP No. 14834 of 2025 3. Office to return the original documents/certified copies, if any, to the petitioner while retaining a copy of the same for the file. Learned High Court Government Pleader is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT:VC