THE SECRETARY v. THE JOINT DIRECTOR FOR FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES
WP/26593/2025 · 2025-09-25
B M Shyam Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 90590 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 90590 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38952 WP No. 26593 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 26593 OF 2025 (GM-PDS) BETWEEN:
THE SECRETARY DISTRICT WOMENS MULTIPURPOSE CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETY, KALLAHALLI II STAGE, VINOBA NAGAR SHIMOGA - 577204
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVARAMU H.C.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE JOINT DIRECTOR FOR FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES SHIMOGA DISTRICT SHIMOGA - 577201.
2.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES, SHIMOGA DISTRICT SHIMOGA - 577201.
3.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SHIMOGA DISTRICT
Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38952 WP No. 26593 of 2025
SHIMOGA - 577201.
4.
SHRI AVIN R, MAJOR, JOINT DIRECTOR OF FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES, SHIMOGA DISTRICT SHIMOGA - 577201.
5.
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR INFORMAL RATIONING AREA SHIMOGA - 577201
…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3 AND R5)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR SIMILAR WRIT
ORDER OR DIRECTION TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 31.05.2025 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN NO.RPR/CR-32/2020-21 AT ANNEXURE-L AND ALSO THE CONSEQUENTIAL ENDORSEMENT DATED 04.08.2025 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE - K IN NO.FSD/RPR/CR-32.2020-21 AT ANNEXURE - K.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38952 WP No. 26593 of 2025
ORAL ORDER Ms. K. P. Yashodha, the learned Additional Government Advocate files on record a copy of the
order dated 25.09.2025 withdrawing the impugned Endorsement and submits that the petitioner's appeal is still pending consideration and there is an interim order which enables the petitioner to continue the business. Mr. H. C. Shivaramu, the learned counsel for the petitioner is also heard. The petition stands
disposed of as having become infructuous without prejudice to the petitioner to prosecute the pending appeal.
Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
RB