V APHC010099822019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 911 OF 2019 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the order dated 15.02.2019, in CMA.No. 25 of 2014, passed by the Learned First Additional District Judge, Guntur. Between: Smt. Valluri @ Dandamudi Sindhura, W/o. Dandamuri Ravi Kumar, Aged 32 Years, Hindu, House wife, R/o. Door No.39-2-1, Koduru Conjuill Apartment, Labbipet, Vijayawada, Krishna District, Rep. by her Special Power of Attorney & Mother, Valluri Siva Leela, Wife of late Venkateswara Rao, aged 55 years, Hindu, Household, Resident of Flat No. 201, Pothuri Residency, Besides Church Kamaiah Thopu of Kanuru Village, Penamaluru Mandat, Krishna District. ...Petitioner/ Appellant/Plaintiff AND 1. Valluri Suseela, Wife of late Krishna Rao (died pendent lite), Hindu, Household, C/o. Murali, R/o. Fiat No. 301, Jyothi Sowbhagya Apartment, Plot No. 161, Santhi nagar, Hyderabad. 2. Mukkamla Vijaya Lakshmi, W/o! Murali, Aged 56 years, Hindu, Housewife, R/o. Flat No. 301, Jyothi Sowbhagya Apartment, Plot No. 161, Santhi nagar, Hyderabad. / 3. Mukkamla Murali, S/o. Uma Maheswara Rao, Aged 60 years, Hindu, Business, R/o. Flat No. 301, Jyothi Sowbhagya Apartment, Plot No. 161, Santhi nagar, Hyderabad. 4. Mukkamla Madhu, S/o. Uma Maheswara Rao, Aged 57 years, Hindu. Builder, C/o. 3'^'^ Respondent, Mukkamala Murali, S/o. Uma Maheswara Rao, Aged 60 years, Hindu, Business, R/o. Flat No. 301, Jyothi Sowbhagya Apartment, Plot No. 161, Santhi nagar, Hyderabad. 5. Racharla Srinu @ Gali Srinu, Father’s name not known. Aged about 35 years, Hindu, Real Estate Broker, R/o. Chirravuru Village, Tadepalli Mandal, Mangalagiri. ...Respondent/ Respondent/ Defendant lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of CPC, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant injunction restraining the respondents/ defendants and their men from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner/ Plaintiff in respect of the plaint schedule property extent of Ac. 1.01 cents situated at D.No. 26/2 of Nuthakki village Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur Division, pending disposal of the Revision Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondents: -- The Court made the following order: i.e., an APHC010099822019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] S TUESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 911/2019 Between; 1.VALLURI ALIAS DANDAMUDI SINDHURA. D.NO. 39-2-1, KODUR CONJIL APARTMENT, LABBIPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA ...PETITIONER AND 1.V SUSEELA, R/0. FLATNO. 301, JYOTHI SOWBHAGYA APARTMENT, POLIT.no. 161, SANTHI NAGAR, HYDERABAD 2.MUKKAMLA VIJAYA LAKSHMI, FLATNO. 301, JYOTHI SOWBHAGYA APARTMENT, PLOT.NO. 161, SANTHINAGAR, HYDERABAD 3.MUKKAMLA MURALI, FLATNO. 301, JYOTHI SOWBHAGYA APARTMENT, PLOT.NO. 161, SANTHINAGAR, HYDERABAD 4.MUKKAMLA MADHU, FLATNO. 301, JYOTHI SOWBHAGYA APARTMENT, PLOT.NO. 161, SANTHINAGAR, HYDERABAD 5.RACHARLA SRINU,' REAL ESTATE BROKER, R/0. CHIRRAVURU VILLAGE, TADEPALLI MANDAL, MANGALAGIRI ...RESPONDENT{S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toaggrieved by the order passed by the learned first Additional District Judge, in CMA.No. 25/2014 dated 15.02.2019 by confirming the orders passed by the learned senior civil judge, Mangalagiri, in lA. 962/2014 in Os. 163/2014 dated 21.10.2014 lANO; 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased 2 Pleased to grant injunction restraining the respondent and their men from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the plaint schedule property an extent of Ac. 1.01 cents situated at D.No. 26/2 of Nuthakki village Mangalagiri Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY C.R.P.No.911 of 2019 ORDER: The present Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning the order dated 15.02.2019 in C.M.A.No.25 of 2014 passed by the I Additional District Judge, Guntur, which was filed aggrieved by the refusal of injunction in I.A.No.962 of 2014 in O.S.No.163 of 2014, dated 21.10.2014 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri. 2. No interim order was passed by this Court. 3. in view of passage of time and considering that the suit is at advanced stage, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to raise all grounds in the suit. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand closed. Sd/- K SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The First Additional District Judge, Guntur, Guntur District. 2. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 3. Three CD Copies GPC AL HIGH COURT DATED: 08/07/2024 ORDER CRP NO. 911 OF 2019 S 2 3 SEP 2025 n 9>h Current Section ^ ^ DISMISSING THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION