Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90584 (PNJ)

BHAGAT SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/44464/2025 · 2025-08-18

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

124 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND Bhagat Singh State of Punjab CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present:- MANISHA BATRA, J. 1. 350 dated 31.12.2023, registered under Sections 294 and 506 of IPC and Section 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act at Police Station P along with all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom qua the petitioner. 2. matter is still under investigation and challan has not been filed so far. the petition is premature. 3. petitioner. 4. counsel, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file afresh at appropriate stage, if so advised. 18.08.2025 Waseem Ansari Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Bhagat Singh Versus Punjab and another CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Liaqat Ali, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ramta Chowdhary, DAG, Punjab. MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition has been made for quashing of FIR No. 350 dated 31.12.2023, registered under Sections 294 and 506 of IPC and Section 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act at Police Station P along with all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom qua the petitioner. At the very outset, learned State counsel has submitted that the matter is still under investigation and challan has not been filed so far. the petition is premature. The aforesaid fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the Keeping in view the submissions as made by learned State counsel, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the er to file afresh at appropriate stage, if so advised. 18.08.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-44464-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.08.2025 ...Petitioner Versus ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Ms. Ramta Chowdhary, DAG, Punjab. Prayer in this petition has been made for quashing of FIR No. 350 dated 31.12.2023, registered under Sections 294 and 506 of IPC and Section 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act at Police Station Phillaur, District Jalandhar along with all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom qua the petitioner. At the very outset, learned State counsel has submitted that the matter is still under investigation and challan has not been filed so far. Hen The aforesaid fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the Keeping in view the submissions as made by learned State counsel, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the er to file afresh at appropriate stage, if so advised. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2025 (O&M) 18.08.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents Prayer in this petition has been made for quashing of FIR No. 350 dated 31.12.2023, registered under Sections 294 and 506 of IPC and Section 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes hillaur, District Jalandhar along with all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom qua the petitioner. At the very outset, learned State counsel has submitted that the Hence, The aforesaid fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the Keeping in view the submissions as made by learned State counsel, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the (MANISHA BATRA) MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.08.19 09:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document