COCP No.3520 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 133 RAJENDER SINGH AND OTHERS Vs SH. T.V.S.N PRASAD AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. for the petitioner Mr. Manish Dadwal, Asstt. A.G., Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) 1. Sh. Abhishek Meena, Deputy Commissioner, Rewari has joined the proceedings through Yadav) and LRs of Sube Singh (respondent No.2 in Writ Petition) before him in his opportunity of hearing shall be afforded available on record as well as No.14343 of 2015 titled ‘ speaking orders and a fresh speaking order thereupon shall be passed within three weeks thereafter and copy thereof 2. At this stage, l though petitioner Nos.1 and along with interest claim from the year Court for regularization may be conside 2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3520 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: RAJENDER SINGH AND OTHERS SH. T.V.S.N PRASAD AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Manish Dadwal, Asstt. A.G., Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) Sh. Abhishek Meena, Deputy Commissioner, Rewari has joined the proceedings through video-conferencing and submits that petitioner No.2 Yadav) and LRs of Sube Singh (respondent No.2 in Writ Petition) before him in his office on 09.06.2025 at 11.00 A.M opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to them available on record as well as the decision dated 10.10.2022 passed in CWP No.14343 of 2015 titled ‘Sudarshan Kumar vs. State of Haryana s dated 02.05.2005 and 18.10.2024 fresh speaking order thereupon shall be passed within three weeks thereafter thereof shall be forwarded to them within one week. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that though petitioner Nos.1 and 3 have been accorded the benefit of regularization along with interest followed by actual benefits the year 2005 i.e. the year in which they have approached for regularization may be considered. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3520 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.05.2025 ......Petitioners ....Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Manish Dadwal, Asstt. A.G., Haryana. Sh. Abhishek Meena, Deputy Commissioner, Rewari has joined the conferencing and submits that petitioner No.2 (Pushpa Yadav) and LRs of Sube Singh (respondent No.2 in Writ Petition) may appear on 09.06.2025 at 11.00 A.M. He further submits that an them and after considering material decision dated 10.10.2022 passed in CWP Sudarshan Kumar vs. State of Haryana and others and 18.10.2024 shall be re-visited/re-examined fresh speaking order thereupon shall be passed within three weeks thereafter within one week. earned counsel for the petitioners also submits that have been accorded the benefit of regularization followed by actual benefits from the year 2015, however, their 2005 i.e. the year in which they have approached this Hon’ble 1 Sh. Abhishek Meena, Deputy Commissioner, Rewari has joined the (Pushpa may appear . He further submits that an and after considering material decision dated 10.10.2022 passed in CWP and others, examined fresh speaking order thereupon shall be passed within three weeks thereafter earned counsel for the petitioners also submits that have been accorded the benefit of regularization their this Hon’ble MOHMED ATIK 2025.06.02 11:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment COCP No.3520 of 2024 3. In view of undertaking extended on behalf of the respondents, the present petition is disposed of. from the year 2005 speaking order. 4. It is made clear that done within the stipulated period the present petition. May 28, 2025 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2024 (O&M) In view of undertaking extended on behalf of the respondents, the present petition is disposed of. Plea regarding grant of benefits along with interest from the year 2005 be also considered by the respondents while passing the . Rule stands discharged. It is made clear that in case the needful in the aforesaid context is not within the stipulated period, the petitioners would at liberty to seek revival of the present petition. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No In view of undertaking extended on behalf of the respondents, the Plea regarding grant of benefits along with interest by the respondents while passing the in case the needful in the aforesaid context is not , the petitioners would at liberty to seek revival of (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2 In view of undertaking extended on behalf of the respondents, the Plea regarding grant of benefits along with interest by the respondents while passing the in case the needful in the aforesaid context is not , the petitioners would at liberty to seek revival of MOHMED ATIK 2025.06.02 11:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment