Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.3744 of 2025
Decided on: 19th March, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sudesh Bala
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and others
.....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Mayank Sharma, Advocate vice
Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Ms. Leena Guleria, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Ms. Leena Guleria, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
Petitioner’s grievance is that her representation dated 12.01.2025 (Annexure P-2), seeking inter-district transfer under 5% quota as notified by the respondents on 20.11.2021, has not been considered and decided by respondent No.2/competent authority till date.
3.
Looking to the limited grievance of the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of by directing
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2
respondent No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 12.01.2025 (Annexure P-2) in accordance with law and applicable transfer policy within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua March 19, 2025
Judge Mukesh