Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90530 (ALL)

ZIYAUL MUSTAFA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/12816/2025 · 2025-09-08

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 12816 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Supplementary Affidavit, filed today, is taken on record. The petitioner has preferred instant writ petition or a direction upon respondent no. 4 - District Basic Education Officer, Ghazipur to correct/ update the e-service book of the petitioner mentioning therein the subject 'Mathematics and Science' replacing the subject 'Urdu' for which the petitioner has already raised his grievance on 21.03.2025 in Manav Sampada Portal. At the very outset, Sri Bipin Bihari Pandey, learned counsel for the BSA emphasized upon Page-6 of the supplementary affidavit, which mentions that the relief as prayed cannot be granted to the petitioner as 'Urdu BTC 2006' has already been mentioned in the appointment letter (Annexure-1 Page-6 of the supplementary affidavit), thus, 'Urdu' shall be shown in the service books of the candidates who have obtained appointment under 'Urdu BTC 2006'. The writ petition lacks merit. It is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. September 9, 2025 DS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abou Sofian Usmani Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bipin Bihari Pandey, C.S.C., Shivendra Kumar Singh (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Ziyaul Mustafa .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DIGAMBER SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad