[2025:RJ-JP:9060] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2615/2025 Dilshad S/o Sahun, R/o Gram Olanda, Police Station Kaithwada District Deeg. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3059/2025 1.Adil S/o Jakar, Aged About 19 Years, 2.Adil S/o Hakmuddin, Aged About 20 Years, both are R/o Village Dharamshala, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg, ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal on behalf of Mr. Surendra Singh Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 03/03/2025 1. Apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No. 172/2024 registered at Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 111(2)(a), 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS and Sections 66D and 66E of IT Act, the petitioners have preferred these anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 BNSS. [2025:RJ-JP:9060] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2615/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the recovery of sim cards and mobile phones etc. were effected from the possession of other co-accused, who have already been enlarged on bail. He further submits that custodial investigation of the accused petitioners is not required. The offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate and petitioners are ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioners. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail applications. 4. I have considered the overall allegations levelled in the FIR and contentions made by the counsel for the parties. 5. Looking to the fact that the recovery of sim cards and mobile phones etc. were effected from the possession of other co- accused, who have already been enlarged on bail. Custodial investigation of the accused petitioners is not required. The offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioners are exclusively tribale by Magistrate and petitioners are ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation, without expressing anything on the merits of the case I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail applications of the accused-petitioners. 6. Accordingly, these anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioners- 1.Dilshad S/o Sahun, 2. Adil S/o Jakar, [2025:RJ-JP:9060] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2615/2025] 3. Adil S/o Hakmuddin, in connection with FIR No.172/2024 registered at Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu 33/35