Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90525 (ALL)

SMT. USHA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WTAX/4272/2025 · 2025-09-08

Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar J Criminal, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 4272 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: "a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 14.07.2025 passed by respondent no. 3 (Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition). b. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 5 to conclude the enquiry regarding complaint of the petitioner dated 03.06.2025, within a period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. c. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 3/Licensing Authority, District-Jhansi to reconsider the matter of the petitioner and take appropriate decision after considering the relevant video clip and conclusion of the enquiry report of respondent no. 5." 3. The impugned order was passed after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and after the petitioner had filed her detailed reply to the same. 4. In light of the same, we do not see any reason to interfere with the impugned order, especially since there is a statutory appeal against the said impugned order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sheo Kinkar Singh, Suryaprakash Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Usha Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. In light of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to file an appeal in terms of the statute within a period of three weeks from date. If such an appeal is filed within three weeks, the authority concerned is directed to grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and, thereafter, pass a reasoned order, in accordance with law. 6. We make it clear that we have not gone into the other prayers of the petitioner and the same are left open before the authority concerned. September 9, 2025 K.K. Maurya WTAX No. 4272 of 2025 2 (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- KAMLESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad