Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90507 (ALL)

ANJU v. BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. AND ANOTHER

WRIC/29846/2025 · 2025-10-05

Neeraj Tiwari, Vivek Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29846 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Anand Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondents, and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:– "1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 12.8.2025 passed by the respondent No. 2 by which slection of the petitioner was rejected. 1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to restrain the respondent for selection of next candidate. 2. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider and decide the application made by the petitioner within stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against the said rejection order dated 12.8.2025, the petitioner has filed a representation dated 31.7.2025 before respondent No. 2 and a direction be issued to the said authority to decide the same expeditiously, for which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. 4. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 Territory Manager, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 31.7.2025 in accordance with law, within a maximum period of four weeks from the date of submission of a certified copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to annex a photocopy of the representation dated 31.7.2025 along with the certified copy of this order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Kumar Shukla, Puneet Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anand Tiwari Anju .....Petitioner(s) Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. And Another .....Respondent(s) 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No. 2 to pass an order after considering the relevant Rules as well as the facts of the case. October 6, 2025 Sumaira WRIC No. 29846 of 2025 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad