Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90505 (ALL)

NEMPAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/30111/2025 · 2025-09-22

Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30111 of 2025 Court No. - 29 (SL No.11) HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Heard Sri Neeraj Srivastava, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Anjali Upadhya, learned counsel for respondents no.2 to 4 and Sri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus restraining the respondent-Authority from preventing him from carrying on squatting from the place, he has been doing business since last 10 to 12 years. The petitioner is claiming rights under the provisions of Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 (in short, 'the Act, 2014'). 3. Ms. Anjali Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, Development Authority, states the Grievance Redressal Committee, as envisaged under the Act, 2014 is already in existence wherein on the basis of a survey report the list has already been prepared wherein the petitioner's claim does not fall and as such it is submitted that the petitioner's claim is premature. However, in case the matter is relegated to the Grievance Redressal Committee, definitely the claim of the petitioner would be dealt with in accordance with law. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Neeraj Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C. Nempal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Having regard to the aforesaid stand of the respondent, Development Authority, we dispose of the instant petition with the observation that it shall be open to the petitioner to raise his grievance by way of a fresh representation before the Grievance Redressal Committee, in which event the Committee will decide the representation so made by the petitioner expeditiously strictly in accordance with law. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) September 23, 2025 Shubham Arya WRIC No. 30111 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM ARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM ARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad