HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30005 of 2025 Court No. - 39 HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J. HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Mr. Manish Kumar Yadav, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, prayer of his client is for directing respondent no.5 (the Sub-Divisional Officer) to correct his address and thereupon generate consumption bills. 2. Mr. Raj Mohan Upadhyay, learned advocate, Additional Chief Standing Counsel appears on behalf of State. Mr. Nitish Kumar Mishra, learned advocate holding the brief appears on behalf of respondent nos. 2 to 5 (the supply company). On query he submits, the connection was given upon verification of the address. 3. On query Mr. Yadav submits, his client is consuming electricity, receiving the bills and paying them. However, in view of petitioner's prayer, he may produce relevant documents to demonstrate error in the address recorded by the supply company. On satisfaction obtained, the supply company may act in accordance with the rules. 4. The writ petition is disposed of. September 1, 2025 Mohini Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Narendra Kumar Tiwari (Arindam Sinha,J.) (Avnish Saxena,J.) Manoj Kumar Srivastaava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHINI RAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad