JAGJIVAN @ JAGGI S/O LOHADEY RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2975/2025 · 2025-03-28
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9049 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9049 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:14456] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2975/2025 Jagjivan @ Jaggi S/o Lohadey Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Khoobpura, Police Station, Kudgaon, District Karauli. (Presently Confined In Jail At Gangapur City) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Utkarsh Goyal, Ms. Chanchal, Mr. Lokendra Sharma, Mr. Ravindra Mavliya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP, Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 28/03/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.30/2025 registered at Police Station Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur for the offence(s) under Sections 8/21 & 8/29 of NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the alleged quantity of smack recovered from the possession of the petitioner is 6 grams 32 mg, which is below commercial quantity. There are two cases have been shown against the petitioner in case No.20/14 State Vs. Chanda @ Chandrashekhar, the petitioner has been acquitted. The charge-
[2025:RJ-JP:14456] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2975/2025] sheet against the petitioner has already been produced. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 28.01.2025. The trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. Considering the fact that the alleged recovered quantity of smack recovered from the possession of the petitioner is below commercial quantity and petitioner. The charge-sheet against the petitioner has already been produced. The trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Jagjivan @ Jaggi S/o Lohadey Ram, in connection with FIR No.30/2025 registered at Police Station Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. The accused is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station shall send the presence report of the accused petitioner to the trial court every
[2025:RJ-JP:14456] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2975/2025] month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Magistrate.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/188