Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90481 (ALL)

GAUTAM KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

WRIC/29968/2025 · 2025-09-08

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29968 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following relief:- " I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the District Inspector of Schools-II, District Saharanpur (Respondent No. 8) to take necessary steps in pursuance of the report dated 02.04.2025 sent by the Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue), Saharanpur (Respondent No. 4) by making appointment of an Authorized Controller to conduct the election of the Committee of Management S. D. Girls Inter College, Railway Colony, District Saharanpur, within a specific period as may be directed by this Hon'ble Court. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the District Inspector of Schools-II, District Saharanpur (Respondent No. 8) to consider and decide the representation dated 17.07.2025 (Annexure No. 15 to the writ petition), within a specific period as may be directed by this Hon'ble Court. " 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.8 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Sri D. P. Singh, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of State- respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri D. P. Singh, learned Standing Counsel and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Shukla, Kamal Pati Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Gautam Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as no objection made by learned standing counsel. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no.8 District Inspector of Schools-II, District Saharanpur within 15 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.8 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. September 9, 2025 AKT WRIC No. 29968 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad