SUNIDHI RANA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/8734/2025 · 2025-08-13
Aaradhna Sawhney
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 90475 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 90475 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 108 CRWP-8734 of 2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 13th August, 2025 Sunidhi Rana and another .....PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Punjab and others .....RESPONDENTS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY. Present: Mr. Navraj Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Kamalpreet Bawa, DAG Punjab. *** AARADHNA SAWHNEY.
, J (ORAL)
Apprehending threat to their life and liberty, both the petitioners have filed the present petition with a prayer to direct the official respondents to decide the representation dated 10.08.2025 (Annexure P-5).
2. The facts, as can be inferred from the petition, are as follows: Both the petitioners, who are major, got married to each other in accordance with Hindu rites and ceremonies on 10.08.2025. Their relationship was not approved of by their parents and they expressed their unhappiness. It is in this backdrop that the present petition has been filed by the petitioners.
3. Notice of motion.
4. Mr. Kamalpreet Bawa, DAG Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents-State of Punjab.
5. Without commenting on validity of the marriage allegedly performed by the petitioners with each other and view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is disposed REEMA SAINI 2025.08.13 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
CRWP-8734 of 2025 (O&M) -2- of with direction to official respondents to decide the representation dated 10.08.2025 (Annexure P-5) within a period of two weeks. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners, then necessary steps warranted under law be taken at the earliest, so as to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.
6. It is, however, clarified that this order shall not be taken to be any expression as regards the alleged marriage of the petitioners and shall not confer any immunity upon the petitioners, in case it is found that they have committed any wrong.
7.
Disposed of accordingly.
8. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of.
(AARADHNA SAWHNEY) 13th August, 2025
JUDGE reema Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No REEMA SAINI 2025.08.13 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh