DEEPESH JI THAKKAR v. SHRI THAKUR JI MAHARAJ, SHRI RAM LAKSHMAN JANKI VIRAJMAN AND 3 OTHERS
SCCRD/67/2025 · 2025-10-09
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 90445 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 90445 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD S.C.C. REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 67 of 2025 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. Sri Chandra Bhan Gupta, learned counsel for the revisionist states that his client is not responding, and he has no instructions in the matter.
2. In view of the statement so made, writ petition stands dismissed for want of instructions. October 10, 2025 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Chandra Bhan Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Deepesh Ji Thakkar .....Revisionist(s) Shri Thakur Ji Maharaj, Shri Ram Lakshman Janki Virajman And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad